Category Archives: Southeast

IFR Probabilities during a Winter Storm

GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East and Rapid Refresh model output, from 0100 through 1400 UTC on March 25 2013

A late winter storm moving through the mid-Altantic states was responsible for an episode of reduced visibilities.  The loop above shows two areas of reduced visibilities initially — one over the Piedmont of Georgia, the Carolinas and Virginia, and one over the Ohio River Valley.  Visibilities decrease as the higher IFR probabilities move in, and, conversely, increase as the higher probabilities move out.  IFR Probabilities over southern Ohio, for example, have a character that suggests the probabilities have been computed chiefly with model data.  Probabilities are somewhat reduced, and the fields are not pixelated (as they are over the Carolina Piedmont, for example).

GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East, Brightness Temperature Difference fields from GOES-East (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) and from Suomi/NPP (10.8 µm- 3.74 µm) around 0700 UTC on 25 March 2013

The animation of the ~0700 UTC IFR Probability and brightness temperature difference field from both GOES-East and from the polar-orbiting Suomi/NPP, above, shows another strength of the IFR Probability product:  It screens out regions where high stratus give a signal.  The top of a stratus deck and the top of a fog deck may have a very similar brightness temperature difference signal.  By fusing the satellite data with a product that includes surface information (such as output from the Rapid Refresh Model), regions with elevated stratus, which clouds do not significantly impact aviation operations, can be removed from the signal.  Only regions with actual surface observation restrictions are highlighted in the IFR probability signal above.

Changing IFR probabilities over Gainesville FL as fog develops

GOES-R IFR Probabilities (Upper Left), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Difference (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) Product (Upper Right), GOES-East Visible Imagery (Lower Right), 0500 UTC on 12 February.

This example shows how the IFR Probability Values changed hourly as IFR conditions developed over the north-central Florida peninsula.  IFR Probabilities around Gainesville — KGNV — are below 10%.  These small values persist through about 0545 UTC, but by 0615 UTC, below, they have increased to around 20% although brightness temperature difference returns have not substantively changed.

As above, but at 0615 UTC

By 0702 UTC, below, values continue to increase, to around 30%, but Gainesville continues to report MVFR conditions.  There is a location nearby, however, over eastern Alachua County, where Probabilities exceed 70%.  Abundant surface waters in eastern Alachua County — Newnans Lake, Santa Fe Lake, Ledwith Lake, Orange Lake and Lochloosa Lake — may have contributed to the initial fog development there.  Note also that the traditional fog detection product, the brightness temperature difference, is also starting to show enhanced returns.

As above, but at 0702 UTC.
As above, but at 0802 UTC

Between 0700 and 0800 UTC (above), probabilities at KGNV increase from 31% to 80%.  The increase largely results from increases in the satellite predictors of low clouds/fog, as shown in the rapid increase in the brightness temperature difference signal around Gainesville.  Nevertheless, ceilings and visibilities at KGNV have not deteriorated to IFR conditions at 0800 UTC.  IFR probabilities remain between 70 and 80% from 0800 to 0915 UTC (below), at which time IFR conditions are reported at the Gainesville airport.  From 0915 UTC to 1215 UTC, IFR conditions continue at the airport, and IFR probabilities are from 85% to 95%.

As above, but at 0915 UTC

As above, but at 1002 UTC.

As above, but at 1102 UTC

As above, but at 1215 UTC

Fog and low clouds in the Southeast US

GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East and Rapid Refresh Data, and surface observations of ceilings and visibility, 0645 UTC-0700 UTC on 11 February (Upper Left), GOES-13 Brightness Temperature Difference, 0645 UTC (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) (Upper Right), Suomi/NPP VIIRS Brightness Temperature Difference (10.8 µm – 3.74 µm) at 0638 UTC (Lower Left), Suomi/NPP Near IR Imagery (3.74 µm) at 0638 UTC (Lower Right)

The image above is a good example of the importance of fused data in many fog/low stratus events.  The near IR imagery, bottom right, shows many different cloud layers.  A strong storm moving towards the East Coast on Monday morning 11 February generated many cloud layers that make the traditional method of fog detection, the brightness temperature difference between 10.7 µm and 3.9 µm, problematic.  Adding information from the model, however, allows the GOES-R product to identify the region of IFR conditions that extends northeastward from central Georgia to central Virginia.

Fatal Crash on I-16 in Georgia: Was it fog-related?

Map of Crash Location, courtesy WMAZ TV in Macon, Georgia

A multi-vehicle accident with fatalities occurred in extreme western Laurens County in central Georgia early Wednesday Morning, 6 February 2013.  (According to this news report, the first crash was around 1310 UTC)  Was fog a factor in this accident?  Fog was reported in and around the scene as first responders arrived.

Laurens County is in the Peachtree City CWA, and the relevant part of the Forecast Discussion at 0000 UTC is as follows: 

000
FXUS62 KFFC 060007
AFDFFC

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...UPDATED FOR AVIATION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA
ISSUED BY NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BIRMINGHAM AL
705 PM EST TUE FEB 5 2013

.SHORT TERM /TONIGHT THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/...

FAIRLY QUIET WEATHER THROUGH THE SHORT TERM PERIOD. A WEAK
SHORTWAVE HAS BROUGHT A BAND OF CLOUDS TO THE AREA AND A FEW
SPRINKLES SHOW UP EVERY NOW AND THEN ON RADAR. CLOUDS ARE EXPECTED
TO THIN OUT OVERNIGHT AND FOG COULD BECOME AN ISSUE IN THE FEW
HOURS BEFORE SUNRISE. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WILL HAVE TO BE
MONITORED THROUGH THE EVENING. MILD TEMPERATURES THROUGH THE
PERIOD.

.LONG TERM /THURSDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/... 
[...snipped...]
&&

.AVIATION... 00Z TAF DISCUSSION.

VFR CIGS WILL CONTINUE ACROSS THE TAF SITES THIS EVENING.
EXPECT MVFR CONDITIONS LATE TONIGHT AS FOG AND LOW CLOUDS DEVELOP
BEGINNING AFTER 06Z NEAR CSG SPREADING NORTH AND EAST. THE ATLANTA
TAF SITES SHOULD EXPECT TO BE IMPACTED BY 08-09Z. IMPROVING
CONDITIONS BY 15Z. LIGHT WESTERLY WINDS EXPECTED. 
 
 So, overnight fog was considered a possibility at 0000 UTC.
And updated AFD was issued shortly before 0600 UTC.  In that update the Aviation discussion was tweaked:
FXUS62 KFFC 060553
AFDFFC

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...UPDATED FOR AVIATION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA
ISSUED BY NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BIRMINGHAM AL
1245 AM EST WED FEB 6 2013

.SHORT TERM /TONIGHT THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/... 
 
[...no changes...]
 
.LONG TERM /THURSDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/... 
 
[...snipped for brevity...]
&&

.AVIATION... 06Z TAF DISCUSSION.

PATCHY CEILINGS BKN030-040 LINGERING THROUGH THE NIGHT. POTENTIAL
FOR LIFR CONDITIONS WHERE SKIES ARE CLEAR...BUT EXPECT ALL TAF SITES
TO HAVE AT LEAST MVFR CONDITIONS 08Z THROUGH 14Z. IMPROVING AFTER
THAT TO VFR. WINDS NORTHWEST 5 TO 10KT AFTER 15Z.


//ATL CONFIDENCE...06Z UPDATE...
MEDIUM CONFIDENCE ON ALL ELEMENTS.
 Note that a mention of LIFR conditions has appeared in the Aviation Discussion.  What did the GOES-R IFR Probability show between 0000 and 0600 UTC?
GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East and Rapid Refresh Data, 0115 through 0515 UTC 6 February, along with hourly observations of ceilings/visibility
Especially in the last two hours — 0415 and 0515 UTC — there is a general expansion in high probabilities from west to east across southern Georgia, with probabilities increasing north of I-16.  By 0815 UTC, below, IFR conditions are being reported at many locations in northwest Georgia, and IFR probabilities continue to increase over east-central Georgia.
As in the loop above, but for 0815 UTC only.  Interstate Highways are denoted in Blue.
The AFD issued at 0930 coincided with the issuance of a dense fog advisory (highlighted in red) for most of the CWA:

000
FXUS62 KFFC 060930
AFDFFC

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA
430 AM EST WED FEB 6 2013

.SHORT TERM /TODAY THROUGH THURSDAY NIGHT/...
SOME LOW LEVEL MOISTURE REMAINING THIS MORNING AND THIS HAS PRODUCED
FOG ACROSS MANY AREAS. WILL GO AHEAD AND ISSUE A DENSE FOG ADVISORY
SINCE MOST PLACES SEEM TO BE HEADED FOR VERY LOW
VISIBILITY.
OTHERWISE DRY HIGH PRESSURE BUILDING OVER THE SOUTHEAST TODAY AND
MOVING OFF THE ATLANTIC COAST TONIGHT. NEXT SHORT WAVE COMING ACROSS
THE NORTHERN GULF SHOULD BEGIN TO AFFECT OUR CWA MAINLY 06Z THURSDAY
AND BEYOND. THIS SOUTHERN STREAM SYSTEM MOVES ACROSS THE STATE
THURSDAY AND THURSDAY NIGHT WITH SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MODELS
WITH LOCATION AND STRENGTH OF SURFACE LOW. IN GENERAL...LOOKS LIKE A
WEDGE SETTING UP LATE TONIGHT INTO THURSDAY WITH MUCH OF THE CWA IN
EASTERLY FLOW. THERE SHOULD BE A SHARP GRADIENT OF TEMPERATURES
BETWEEN NORTH AND CENTRAL ZONES AND FOR NOW HAVE KEPT THE WARMER AIR
ON THURSDAY CONFINED TO COLUMBUS TO MACON AND SOUTH. CATEGORICAL
POPS FOR THURSDAY TAPERING OFF WEST TO EAST THURSDAY NIGHT AS THE
SURFACE LOW MOVES EAST. NO MENTION OF THUNDER AS WEDGE SHOULD BE
STABLE. HOWEVER SOME INSTABILITY COULD PUSH INTO THE CENTRAL ZONES
THURSDAY AFTERNOON ALONG THE BOUNDARY.

41


.LONG TERM /FRIDAY THROUGH TUESDAY/... 
[...snipped...] 
01

&&

.AVIATION...
06Z TAF DISCUSSION.
PATCHY CEILINGS BKN030-040 LINGERING THROUGH THE NIGHT. POTENTIAL
FOR LIFR CONDITIONS WHERE SKIES ARE CLEAR...BUT EXPECT ALL TAF
SITES TO HAVE AT LEAST MVFR CONDITIONS 08Z THROUGH 14Z. IMPROVING
AFTER THAT TO VFR. WINDS NORTHWEST 5 TO 10KT AFTER 15Z.

//ATL CONFIDENCE...06Z UPDATE...
MEDIUM CONFIDENCE ON ALL ELEMENTS.

41

&&

.PRELIMINARY POINT TEMPS/POPS... 
[...snipped...]
 &&

.FFC WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES...
DENSE FOG ADVISORY UNTIL 9 AM EST THIS MORNING FOR THE FOLLOWING
ZONES
: BALDWIN...BANKS...BARROW...BARTOW...BIBB...BLECKLEY...
BUTTS...CARROLL...CATOOSA...CHATTAHOOCHEE...CHATTOOGA...
CHEROKEE...CLARKE...CLAYTON...COBB...COWETA...CRAWFORD...CRISP...
DADE...DAWSON...DEKALB...DODGE...DOOLY...DOUGLAS...EMANUEL...
FANNIN...FAYETTE...FLOYD...FORSYTH...GILMER...GLASCOCK...
GORDON...GREENE...GWINNETT...HALL...HANCOCK...HARALSON...
HARRIS...HEARD...HENRY...HOUSTON...JACKSON...JASPER...
JEFFERSON...JOHNSON...JONES...LAMAR...LAURENS...LUMPKIN...
MACON...MADISON...MARION...MERIWETHER...MONROE...MONTGOMERY...
MORGAN...MURRAY...MUSCOGEE...NEWTON...NORTH FULTON...OCONEE...
OGLETHORPE...PAULDING...PEACH...PICKENS...PIKE...POLK...
PULASKI...PUTNAM...ROCKDALE...SCHLEY...SOUTH FULTON...SPALDING...
STEWART...SUMTER...TALBOT...TALIAFERRO...TAYLOR...TELFAIR...
TOOMBS...TOWNS...TREUTLEN...TROUP...TWIGGS...UNION...UPSON...
WALKER...WALTON...WARREN...WASHINGTON...WEBSTER...WHEELER...
WHITE...WHITFIELD...WILCOX...WILKES...WILKINSON.

&&

$$

SHORT TERM...41
LONG TERM....01
AVIATION...41

The animation from 0815 UTC through 1315 UTC shows a continued increase in the probabilities over the crash site on I-16.  In addition, observations decrease to IFR conditions.  Note that at 1315 UTC the switch between nighttime and daytime predictors is present in the image as a southwest to northeast boundary over extreme eastern Georgia.  Probabilities are high over the crash site, but by 1415 UTC, they have all but vanished as the fog quickly dissipated at sunrise.  This suggests a fog that is not thick, and the GOES-R Cloud Thickness corroborates this assumption (see below)

As in the loop above, but from 0815 UTC through 1315 UTC.  Crash occurred at 1310 UTC
GOES-R Cloud Thickess just before Twilight Conditions, 1215 UTC 6 February.  Values near the Crash Site are 600-700 feet.
The Cloud Thickness field, above, at 1215 UTC, just before twilight conditions, shows values around 600 to 700 feet.  This chart suggests a rapid dissipation time of around 1 hour.  Indeed, visible imagery around  sunrise shows scant evidence of widespread fog.
Zoomed-in GOES-13 Visible Imagery over east-central Georgia, times as indicated.  Montrose (Yellow square) is indicated within Laurens County (outlined in green)
Polar orbiters also provide information — at higher spatial resolution — about the evolving situation overnight.  Suomi/NPP made two passes over Georgia between 0600 and 0900 UTC, and the brightness temperature difference product that was produced is shown below.    There is a noticeable increase in water clouds over Georgia between 0632 UTC and 0811 UTC, the times of the images.

Suomi-NPP Brigthness Temperature Difference (10.80 µm- 3.74 µm) at 0632 UTC and 0811 UTC.  Interstate 16 crosses Laurens County near the center of these images.

MODIS data from Aqua were used to produce IFR probabilities at 0645 UTC, below.  This was before the most fog had developed, but it does confirm the picture painted with GOES data’s broader brush:  IFR probabilities are increasing over Georgia.

MODIS-based GOES-R IFR Probabilities over Georgia, 0645 UTC on 6 February 2013.

Finally, AVHRR data from NOAA-15 from 1015 UTC show widespread stratus extending eastnortheast from southwest Georgia to central Georgia.

Brightness Temperature Difference (10.8 µm – 3.74 µm) from AVHRR data, 1028 UTC 6 Feb 2013

IFR conditions with multiple clouds layers over the southeast US

GOES-R IFR Probabilities from GOES-East (Upper Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Differences (Upper Right), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Left), Surface Observations of Ceilings and Visibility (Lower Right), all at 1000 UTC on 16 January 2013

A slowly-moving weather system brought extensive cloudiness and IFR and near-IFR conditions over the southeast part of the United States again on January 16, and provided a good example of how the fused nature of the GOES-R Fog/Low Stratus product — combining both satellite and model information — yields a better signal (than is available from the traditional brightness temperature difference product) of where fog and low stratus are most likely.  The imagery from 1000 UTC, which is characteristic of the entire event, shows a brightness temperature difference signal over the southest that is consistent with the observed multiple cloud layers.  Such a cloud configuration makes it very difficult to relate the brightness temperature difference signal to surface observations.  in contrast, the IFR Probability field show a widespread region of high probabilities, overlapping the regions of near-IFR and IFR observations over Tennessee, and points south.  Cloud thickness, which is computed only where single water-cloud layers are detected from satellite, indicates cloud thicknesses around 1000 feet.  Note that where the cloud thickness is diagnosed, in general, IFR probabilities are relatively larger.  This is because IFR probabilities combine satellite predictors and model predictors.  If the satellite predictors cannot be generated because of multiple cloud layers and/or a single high cirrus deck, then only the model predictors are driving the IFR probability value, and the probability will therefore be lower.  This is the case over western Tennessee and central Georgia.

Evolution of Fog/Low Stratus over Florida

GOES-R IFR Probabilities (Upper Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Difference (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) (Upper Right), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Left), GOES-East 6.5 µm imagery (Lower Right), from ~0000 UTC on 3 January 2013

GOES-R IFR Probabilities captured the evolution of IFR (and Low IFR) conditions over and around the Florida peninsula from late on 2 January through morning on 3 January 2013.  Advection fog over the chilly coastal waters of the eastern Gulf of Mexico stayed mainly offshore (although Sarasota at 00 UTC reports IFR conditions) and is captured well by the GOES-R product.  This is a region underneath high cirrus and as such, the traditional brightness temperature product is blind to the existence of low clouds there.

Over the course of the night, fog and low stratus developed over land, and the GOES-R IFR probability product captured that evolution as well (below, hourly imagery).  Again, there are regions where the brightness temperature difference product is not useable because of multiple cloud layers, and the Rapid Refresh Model output is controlling the IFR Probabilities — these are regions where the IFR probability field is very smooth and typically exhibits lower probability values even though IFR conditions may be observed (For example, at Gainesville and Jacksonville at 0600 UTC).  By morning, visibilities were under 1/4 mile over much of the central Florida Peninsula (For example, Orlando).

As above, but hourly imagery from 0000 UTC through 1400 UTC on 3 January 2013.

The 3/4-full moon allows for plenty of illumination for the Day/Night band on VIIRS, which is flying on Suomi/NPP.  The 0700 UTC imagery, below, demonstrates the difficulty of using the DNB at night to detect fog — city lights that shine through low clouds.  Fog is detected in rural regions, but where city lights exist, the signal is difficult to extract.

GOES-R IFR Probabilities (Upper Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Difference (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) (Upper Right), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Left), Suomi/NPP VIIRS Day/Night Band 0.7 µm imagery (Lower Right), from ~0700 UTC on 3 January 2013

The visible imagery at 1500 UTC, below, shows the horizontal extent of the stratus deck through central Florida.  The region matches well with the IFR Probabilities because visible imagery during the day is used as a cloud-clearing mechanism in the GOES-R algorithms.  Note also how the reflected 3.9 µm solar radiation during the day renders the brightness temperature difference product ineffectual.

GOES-R IFR Probabilities (Upper Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Difference (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) (Upper Right), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Left), GOES-East visible (0.63 µm) imagery (Lower Right), from ~1500 UTC on 3 January 2013

From the Archives: December 3, 2012

It is always possible to reconstruct the GOES-R IFR Products and to re-inject them into AWIPS for case studies.  For example, Columbia, SC, notified us of a fog event there on the morning of December 3rd, 2012 (See here).  The imagery below was created on 19 December and shows the development of the GOES-R IFR probabilities over the entire southeast during this event.

GOES-R IFR Probabilities from 3 December 2012

IFR probabilities increase first along coastal South Carolina and Georgia and then increase inland.  The animations below show the hourly changes in visibility (top) and ceiling (bottom) from 0000 UTC to 1400 UTC on 3 December.

Visibility (Statute Miles) from 0000 UTC to 1400 UTC on 3 December

Ceiling Height (feet) from 0000 UTC to 1400 UTC on 3 December 2012

The brightness temperature difference animation, below, from 0145 UTC through 1345 UTC, shows the development of the low stratus over coastal South Carolina and Georgia.  The Brightness temperature difference field loses its signal at sunrise, however, even though observations show fog and low stratus persisting.

Brightness Temperature Difference (BTD) (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) from 0145 UTC through 1345 UTC, from GOES-East

Florida Radiation Fog

GOES-R IFR Probabilities (Upper Left) computed from GOES-East, GOES-East Brightness Temperature Differences (10.7 µm – 3.9 µm) (Upper right), GOES-R Cloud Thickness product (Lower Left), GOES-East Visible Imagery (0.63 µm) (Lower Right), hourly from 0615 UTC through 1215 UTC on 14 December 2012

Light north winds over Florida over night were accompanied by the development of low stratus and fog that were captured well by the traditional fog detection product, the brightness temperature difference between 10.7 µm and 3.9 µm that occurs because of emissivity differences in water clouds at the two wavelengths.  Because of the strong satellite signal (upper right), the GOES-R IFR Probabilities over Florida were quite high.  When mid-level and high clouds are absent, IFR probabilities in regions of fog development can easily exceed 90%, as shown above.

Note, however, what happens at sunrise.  The increase in reflected 3.9 µm solar radiation causes the brightness temperature signal to vanish.  (At later times, the sign of the brightness temperature difference will flip).  The GOES-R IFR probability product maintains a coherent signal through sunrise, although values shift somewhat, as can be seen by the southwest to northeast boundary in the final image of the loop over Florida and extreme southeast Georgia.

Cloud thickness, bottom left, can be used to estimate when radiation-induced stratus or fog will ‘burn off’ — thicker clouds will take longer to dissipate.

Note in this loop that the eastern coastline of Mobile Bay shows a signal in the Brightness Temperature Difference.  This signal is likely an artifact of poor co-registration between Bands 2 and 4 (the 3.9 µm and 10.7 µm channels, respectively) on GOES-13.  NESDIS scientists and engineers are working to mitigate this time-dependent error.

The Fog/Low Stratus products can be compared to data from Suomi/NPP.  The VIIRS instrument includes a day/night band that uses reflected moonlight as a light source (below).  Unfortunately, because the moon was new on December 13th, 2012, very little reflected light is available.  Nevertheless, smearing of city lights over Florida does suggest the presence of fog.

As above, but with Day/Night band from VIIRS on Suomi/NPP instead of GOES-13 0.63 µm visible imagery.  Images from ~0630 UTC on 14 December.

Fog Detection under multiple cloud layers

GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East data (Upper left), GOES-East traditional brightness temperature difference product (Upper right), GOES-East 10.7 µm imagery (Lower left), Surface observations of ceiling/visibility (Lower right)

Weather over Florida on 12 December 2012 gives another example of the importance of fused data products in computing IFR probabilities/detecting low clouds and fog.  When mulitple cloud layers are present, as today over Florida, the traditional brightness temperature difference product (10.7  µm – 3.9 µm) can struggle to produce a useful signal.  Adding information about the lowest part of the atmosphere from the Rapid Refresh model, however, allows a coherent prediction of IFR probabilities to be made.  Note that the stations with the most significant reductions in ceilings/visibility do align with the stripe of higher IFR probability over the northern part of the Florida peninsula.

Gulf of Mexico Fog

GOES-R IFR Probabilities computed from GOES-East (Upper Left), GOES-East Brightness Temperature Difference (10.7 µm – 3.9µm ) (Upper Right), GOES-East Visible imagery (0.63 µm) (Lower Left), GOES-R Cloud Thickness (Lower Right), all from ~2030 UTC on 9 December 2012

Fog was present in the northeast Gulf of Mexico at sunset on December 9th, and the GOES-R Products was able to track its evolution as it slowly moved onshore.  Late-in-the-day visible imagery from 2030 UTC 9 December (above) shows the fog bank tucked into the northeast corner of the Gulf of Mexico.  By 0100 UTC on 10 December (below), some of the fog as moved inland, and visibilities/ceilings at Crystal River have decreased to IFR conditions.  Note in the 0100 UTC image the presence of mid-level clouds is creating a hole in the Brightness Temperature Difference Signal over the eastern Gulf of Mexico just northwest of Tampa, and in the Cloud Thickness product.  IFR Probabilities in this region are considerably reduced, as well.

As at top, but for 0100 UTC on 10 December
As above but for 0402 UTC on 10 December

By 0400 UTC on 10 December, the fog/low stratus continue to press inland, as ceilings and visibilities decrease.  Note also the presence of higher clouds in the brightness temperature difference product.  In these regions, satellite predictors are not use to compute the IFR probability product;  consequently, IFR Probabilities over and around Apalachee Bay in the extreme northeast Gulf of Mexico are somewhat reduced; in addition, the field is considerably flatter (compared to the more pixelated character close to Tampa).  At 0802 UTC (below), the presence of mid-level clouds peaks.  Note that the brightness temperature difference product shows very little strong signal over the northern part of the Florida peninsula, despite significant visibility obscurations there (consider Gainesville, for example, with a 1/4-mile visibility).

As above but for 0802 UTC on 10 December
As above, but for 1102 UTC on 10 December

By 1102 UTC, the mid-level cloudiness has dissipated, allowing the brightness temperature difference to have a distinct signal.  Consequently, the IFR probability field increases.  The combination of both satellite predictors and model (Rapid Refresh) predictors being used allows for a consistent signal throughout the night over this evolving fog/stratus deck.  In addition, the signal over the ocean, at the end of the day on 9 December, in a region where surface observations are not routine, could serve as an alert to the early development of nocturnal fog.

Note that the Tampa Bay office of the National Weather Service noted the IFR probability field in its forecast discussion:

 
000
FXUS62 KTBW 100034
AFDTBW

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAMPA BAY RUSKIN FL
734 PM EST SUN DEC 9 2012

.FOR THE EVENING UPDATE...
SURFACE HIGH PRESSURE WILL REMAIN OVER THE REGION WITH A STRONG
MID LEVEL SUBSIDENCE INVERSION AND STABLE AIR MASS OVER THE
FORECAST AREA. AREA OF FOG...LOCALLY DENSE...HAS PERSISTED THROUGH
THE DAY OVER THE COASTAL WATERS NORTH OF VENICE AND LOCALLY
ONSHORE FROM ABOUT ANNA MARIA ISLAND NORTH TO CEDAR KEY. AREA OF
LOCALLY DENSE FOG WILL GRADUALLY PUSH ONSHORE THE COASTAL
COUNTIES THIS EVENING...WITH FOG DEVELOPING OVER INTERIOR BECOMING
LOCALLY DENSE AFTER MIDNIGHT. CURRENT ZONES ARE ON TRACK WITH NO
UPDATE PLANNED.

&&

.AVIATION...
GOES-R IFR AND LIFR PROBABILITY PRODUCTS NICELY OUTLINE AN AREA OF
SEA FOG THAT HAS LINGERED ACROSS NEAR SHORE WATERS FROM BIG BEND
SOUTH TO AROUND VENICE. THIS SEA FOG IS RIGHT ALONG THE COASTLINE
AND IS VISIBLE ON SOME BEACH WEB CAMS IN THE AREA AND THEREFORE IS
POISED TO MOVE INLAND ONCE TEMPS FALL SOME. THE BIG QUESTION IN ALL
THIS IS WHETHER THE WEAK WRLY WINDS ASSOC W/ THE SEA BREEZE
CIRCULATION WILL CONTINUE LATE ENOUGH TO PUSH THE SEA FOG BANK
INLAND IMPACTING TAMPA BAY AREA SITES. PREVIOUS TAFS WERE COUNTING
ON THIS OCCURRING AND WILL CONTINUE CLOSE TO THE FORECAST ALTHOUGH
HAVE NOTED 18Z MAV AND LATEST LAMP HAVE STRONGLY BACKED OFF ON THE
FOG FOG FORECAST AND NOW CONFINED FOG TO MUCH LATER IN THE NIGHT
CLOSER TO SUNRISE. WILL HAVE TO WATCH CLOSE AND AMEND AS NEEDED IN
NEXT FEW HOURS AS ONSET OF LIFR CONDITIONS IS BIGGEST QUESTION MARK
TONIGHT. LIFR CONDITIONS ARE PRETTY CERTAIN AROUND 12Z AND WILL SEE
SLOW IMPROVEMENT TO MVFR LEVELS THROUGH 18Z. MVFR LEVELS MAY LINGER
AND CONTINUE BEYOND 18Z AS MOISTURE SURGES INTO THE AREA LEADING TO
SCT SHRA ACROSS THE ENTIRE AREA AND POSSIBLY A FEW TSTMS MAINLY
AROUND OR EAST OF SRN SITES (FMY, RSW, PGD). MODELS SUGGEST
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF MORE WIDESPREAD SEAFOG EVENT LATE TOMORROW
AS MOISTURE CONTINUES TO INCREASE AND A MORE PERSISTENT SW FLOW
DEVELOPS. 
 
 
MODIS-based GOES-R IFR Probabilities, 0334 UTC 10 December (above) and 0745 UTC 10 December (below)

MODIS-based GOES-R IFR Probabilities, above, show a similar evolution of the field, from fairly constrained over northern Florida at 0334 UTC, and determined by both satellite and model fields, to more widespread but deteremined more by model fields only at 0745 UTC.